-
Categories
Categories -
Archive
-
Search
Trump’s “Extreme Vetting” Measures for Non-Citizens Released for Public Comment
During his presidential campaign, President Trump made repeated promises to conduct “extreme vetting” of all non-citizens applying for admission into the U.S. On May 4, 2017, the U.S. Department of State (“DOS”) released its proposal for “extreme vetting” measures, which...
Advancements for EB-2 India and China in State Department Visa Bulletin
There is good news ahead for foreign nationals waiting to file their employment-based green card applications under the EB-2 category. The March 2015 Department of State Visa Bulletin has advanced the EB-2 India cut-off date from September 1, 2005 to...
EB-3 China Update
A journey through time with the man behind the visa bulletin In February, we discussed the progression of EB-3 China visa numbers in our blog. Since that time, several changes to EB-3 visa availability have occurred. As a result of...
State Department Visa Bulletin Jumps Four Years for EB-2 Foreign Nationals from India
The number of foreign nationals from India who can file employment-based green card applications is likely to increase significantly now that the latest U.S. State Department Visa Bulletin has jumped ahead by nearly four years. Based on the July Visa...
EB-2 Chinese Nationals: Tired of waiting to apply for a Green Card? EB-3 may be a faster option
Recent USCIS guidance indicates that individuals from China with timely filed EB-2 category I-140s can now take advantage of movement in the Visa Bulletin’s EB-3 category by having their employers file a new EB-3 I-140 petition. In doing so, the...
CONTACT US TODAY
Sign Up for Our
Newsletter
- (312) 427-6163
- (312) 427-6513
Nuvew | Copyright 2024. All Rights Reserved | Accessibility Notice | Privacy Policy
Attorney Advertising. This information is designed for general information only. The information presented should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Past results and testimonials are not a guarantee, warranty, or prediction of the outcome of your case, and should not be construed as such. Past results cannot guarantee future performance. Any result in a single case is not meant to create an expectation of similar results in future matters because each case involves many different factors, therefore, results will differ on a case-by-case basis.